THE
SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE WORSHIP OF MOLECH AND DSM V’s DIAGNOSIS OF SEXUAL
SADISM
Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental Illnesses; Sexual Sadism Disorder Diagnostic
Criteria 302.84 (F65.52)
Over
a period of at least 6 months, recurrent and intense sexual arousal from the
physical or psychological suffering of another person, as manifested by
fantasies, urges, or behaviors.
The
individual has acted on these sexual urges with a nonconsenting person, or
the sexual urges or fantasies cause clinically significant distress or
impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.
Diagnostic Features
The
diagnostic criteria for sexual sadism disorder are intended to apply both to
individuals who freely admit to having such paraphilic interests and to those
who deny any sexual interest in the physical or psychological suffering of
another individual despite substantial objective evidence to the contrary.
...Examples
of individuals who deny any interest in the physical or psychological
suffering of another individual include individuals known to have inflicted
pain or suffering on multiple victims on separate occasions but who deny any
urges or fantasies about such sexual behavior and who may further claim that
known episodes of sexual assault were either unintentional or nonsexual.
Others may admit past episodes of sexual behavior involving the infliction of
pain or suffering on a nonconsenting individual but do not report any
significant or sustained sexual interest in the physical or psychological
suffering of another individual. Since these individuals deny having urges or
fantasies involving sexual arousal to pain and suffering, it follows that
they would also deny feeling subjectively distressed or socially impaired by
such impulses. Such individuals may be diagnosed with sexual sadism disorder
despite their negative self-report. Their recurrent behavior constitutes
clinical support for the presence of the paraphilia of sexual sadism (by satisfying
Criterion A) and simultaneously demonstrates that their paraphilically
motivated behavior is causing clinically significant distress, harm, or risk
of harm to others (satisfying Criterion B).
"Recurrent"
sexual sadism involving nonconsenting others (i.e., multiple victims, each on
a separate occasion) may, as general rule, be interpreted as three or more
victims on separate occasions. Fewer victims can be interpreted as satisfying
this criterion, if there are multiple instances of infliction of pain and
suffering to the same victim, or if there is corroborating evidence of a
strong or preferential interest in pain and suffering involving multiple
victims. Note that multiple victims, as suggested earlier, are a sufficient
but not a necessary condition for diagnosis, as the criteria may be met if
the individual acknowledges intense sadistic sexual interest.
N.Y. State Lawmaker Apologizes
for Blackface Costume
By
Sonia Kennebeck, CNN
Tue
February 26, 2013
Story
Highlights
·Brooklyn Democrat Dov
Hikind dressed in blackface for a Purim party.
·He apologized to "anyone who was
offended" but added, "that was not the intention."
·One of his Assembly colleagues calls
the apology "a beginning" but inadequate.
The
Ashkenazi Jewish Slave Trade was not primarily for cheap labor. The race of
the victims was used as an excuse to cover the real goal. The real reason for
Ashkenazi-influenced enslavement of Africans (and all other people since) is
demonic torture, sex, and murder. The Babylonian Talmud advocates what the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Illnesses, Volume 5 describes as
sexual sadism. Unless it is forcibly stopped, this group of people (including
non-Ashkenazi members who have aligned themselves with Molech-worshiping
members of the Ashkenazim) will not stop torturing, raping, and killing. Like
the demons who possess them, they are sex addicts. Without Jehovah-approved
force, they will not stop. They will continue to use politics, race, financial
issues, and other irrelevant issues in the same manner that all junkies use
excuses to hide their addiction. There are no political, religious, social,
or other irrelevant issues. They are snuff addicts. Unless they are stopped,
they will continue to try to satiate an insatiable appetite for torture,
deviant sex, and murder – a parasitic appetite that, if left unchecked, will
be the undoing of the entire human race. They are snuff addicts. Nothing more
– nothing less.
Ashkenazi sexual sadist achieving climax by
using a whip to rape a helpless human being to death.
Emancipate
yourselves from mental slavery… none but ourselves can free our minds.”
-
The Honorable Robert Nesta Marley –
Myth of the Curse
of Black/Dark Skin...
What is its
basis?
Anti-black racism is seen, at least superficially as a societal scourge
that has all but been eradicated from mainstream American and Western
European societies. Sure, there are a few die-hard individuals, mostly
displayed by the media as KKK or Neo-Nazi white Christian splinter groups
that routinely preach the inferiority of dark skin to their members. The
media, in its depiction of racists, always points to white Christians as
the individuals who introduced the idea of white supremacy and the
inferiority of dark-skinned Africans to mainstream white Christian society.
Nothing could be farther from the truth.
The Babylonian Talmud, a book of European Jewish history and lore, explains
its now centuries-old religiously-fomented rationalization of the
inferiority of dark skin on page 108b, where it reads: "Our
Rabbis taught: Three copulated in the ark, and they were all punished -
the dog, the raven and Ham. The dog was doomed to be tied, the raven
expectorates [his seed into his mate's mouth], and Ham was smitten in his
skin." (This is footnoted, and the footnote reads: "I.e., from
him was descended Cush (the Negro), who is black-skinned."
Another European Jewish document, the Midrash Rabbah (Soncino) Vol. 1, p.
293 says: "AND HE SAID: CURSED BE CANAAN (Breishit 9:25): (Commentary
omitted)...R. Huna also said in R. Joseph's name: You [i.e. Noah is
speaking to Ham) have prevented me from doing something in the dark [i.e.
cohabiting with his wife], therefore your seed will be ugly and
dark-skinned. R. Chiyya said: Ham and the dog copulated in the Ark
therefore, Ham came forth black-skinned while the dog publicly exposed its
copulation."
Mr. Lester, a Jewish man who posted comments on the internet regarding
Judaism said the following regarding the book Artsot Ha Hayyim: "In
1992 a book was published by a leading member of the Satmar community
entitled Artsot Ha-Hayyim. On p. 52 he explains, and quotes other rabbis,
that the reason Abraham Lincoln was killed was because he freed the blacks.
This is also the reason why Kennedy was killed, i.e. because he was good to
the blacks. He continues by saying that this will be the fate of any who
adopt a progressive attitude towards blacks, because they are meant to be
enslaved. His source for this is Ham's curse." (Please see pages 52A
and 52B of Artsot Ha-Hayyim, below.)
Artsot Ha Hayyim contains the names of many rabbis.
Louis Ginzberg authored the book Legends of the
Jews. In Vol. 1, page 169 Mr. Ginzberg writes:
"The descendants of Ham through Canaan therefore have red eyes,
because Ham looked upon the nakedness of his father; they have misshapen
lips, because Ham spoke with his lips to his brothers about the unseemly
condition of his father; they have twisted curly hair, because Ham turned
and twisted his head round to see the nakedness of his father; and they go
about naked, because Ham did not cover the nakedness of his father. Thus he was requited, for it is the way of G-d to mete
out punishment measure for measure. ...The last will and testament of
Canaan addressed to his children read as follows: "Speak not the
truth; hold not yourselves aloof from theft; lead a dissolute life; hate
your master with an exceeding great hate; and love one another."
The Torah Anthology, another European Jewish document, details the true
origin of the slanderous belief of the inferiority of dark skin in Vol. 1,
p. 392-3: "Ham received five punishments: 1. Because he looked at his
naked father, his eyes became red, always appearing bloodshot. 2. Because
he mockingly told his brothers about his father's condition, his lips were
made thick and gross, like those of a Negro. 3. Because he turned his head
to see his father, the hair of his head and beard became kinky. 4. Because
he did not cover his father, it was decreed that he always go naked. We
thus see that slaves in Egypt go naked. They even did so in Egypt. This was
not because of poverty since it is impossible to imagine that none of them
would have enough money to buy clothing. The reason is that they live in a
hot, damp climate, and it is uncomfortable to wear clothing. The reason for
this is their geographical location since the Hamitic tribes live in
tropical climes. It was this curse that caused them to live there. They
must therefore go naked and become blackened by the sun. The fifth curse
will be discussed later."
At this website, Mr. Lester goes on to say: "The curse of Ham was
something I learned of as a child and could not understand its origin from
the words in Genesis. The curse of Ham was widely used by slave owners in
the South to justify the enslavement of blacks. In my studies of slavery, I
was unable to find the basis. Only when I began studying Torah and various
commentaries did I find the source. Somehow the rabbinic commentaries made
their way into Christian culture and became an underpinning for anti-black
racism."
Mr. Shapiro, a Jewish man who
responded to Mr. Lester's post ends by saying: "How to defeat racism?
Torah is obviously not the answer since so many Jews who spend their whole
lives immersed in Torah are racists."
It does not make sense to believe that any Christian, white, black or
green, would or could introduce to the world any religious concept based on
the first book of the Bible. The first book of the Bible was written in
Hebrew. Religious teachings based on this book would best come from individuals
who speak Hebrew. White Christians, for the most part, do not speak Hebrew.
European Jews, on the other hand, do.
According to the Encyclopedia Judaica, under the subtitle
"Slavery", Spanish and Portuguese Jews acted as brokers during
the African slave trade.
The European Jewish community (in particular its rabbis) had the religious
knowledge and authority to disseminate both truth and falsehood in the name
of God and the Torah. Using this position of authority to profit financially
was the real reason for the promulgation of the defamatory religious myth.
This defamatory religious myth resulted in the creation of specific types
of bigotry: anti-African racism, anti-black racism, anti-Hamitic racism,
anti-Cushitic racism and anti-Canaanite racism.
How did the victims of this Jewish religiously-fomented anti-black
slander affect African slaves and their progeny?
![Jew whipping slave[6]](chapter_5_european_ashkenazi_judaic_myth_of_the_curse_of_ham_files/image014.png)
