THE SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE WORSHIP OF MOLECH AND DSM V’s DIAGNOSIS OF SEXUAL SADISM
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Illnesses; Sexual Sadism Disorder Diagnostic Criteria 302.84 (F65.52)
Over a period of at least 6 months, recurrent and intense sexual arousal from the physical or psychological suffering of another person, as manifested by fantasies, urges, or behaviors.
The individual has acted on these sexual urges with a nonconsenting person, or the sexual urges or fantasies cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.
The diagnostic criteria for sexual sadism disorder are intended to apply both to individuals who freely admit to having such paraphilic interests and to those who deny any sexual interest in the physical or psychological suffering of another individual despite substantial objective evidence to the contrary.
...Examples of individuals who deny any interest in the physical or psychological suffering of another individual include individuals known to have inflicted pain or suffering on multiple victims on separate occasions but who deny any urges or fantasies about such sexual behavior and who may further claim that known episodes of sexual assault were either unintentional or nonsexual. Others may admit past episodes of sexual behavior involving the infliction of pain or suffering on a nonconsenting individual but do not report any significant or sustained sexual interest in the physical or psychological suffering of another individual. Since these individuals deny having urges or fantasies involving sexual arousal to pain and suffering, it follows that they would also deny feeling subjectively distressed or socially impaired by such impulses. Such individuals may be diagnosed with sexual sadism disorder despite their negative self-report. Their recurrent behavior constitutes clinical support for the presence of the paraphilia of sexual sadism (by satisfying Criterion A) and simultaneously demonstrates that their paraphilically motivated behavior is causing clinically significant distress, harm, or risk of harm to others (satisfying Criterion B).
"Recurrent" sexual sadism involving nonconsenting others (i.e., multiple victims, each on a separate occasion) may, as general rule, be interpreted as three or more victims on separate occasions. Fewer victims can be interpreted as satisfying this criterion, if there are multiple instances of infliction of pain and suffering to the same victim, or if there is corroborating evidence of a strong or preferential interest in pain and suffering involving multiple victims. Note that multiple victims, as suggested earlier, are a sufficient but not a necessary condition for diagnosis, as the criteria may be met if the individual acknowledges intense sadistic sexual interest.
N.Y. State Lawmaker Apologizes
for Blackface Costume
By Sonia Kennebeck, CNN
Tue February 26, 2013
· Brooklyn Democrat Dov Hikind dressed in blackface for a Purim party.
· He apologized to "anyone who was offended" but added, "that was not the intention."
· One of his Assembly colleagues calls the apology "a beginning" but inadequate.
The Ashkenazi Jewish Slave Trade was not primarily for cheap labor. The race of the victims was used as an excuse to cover the real goal. The real reason for Ashkenazi-influenced enslavement of Africans (and all other people since) is demonic torture, sex, and murder. The Babylonian Talmud advocates what the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Illnesses, Volume 5 describes as sexual sadism. Unless it is forcibly stopped, this group of people (including non-Ashkenazi members who have aligned themselves with Molech-worshiping members of the Ashkenazim) will not stop torturing, raping, and killing. Like the demons who possess them, they are sex addicts. Without Jehovah-approved force, they will not stop. They will continue to use politics, race, financial issues, and other irrelevant issues in the same manner that all junkies use excuses to hide their addiction. There are no political, religious, social, or other irrelevant issues. They are snuff addicts. Unless they are stopped, they will continue to try to satiate an insatiable appetite for torture, deviant sex, and murder – a parasitic appetite that, if left unchecked, will be the undoing of the entire human race. They are snuff addicts. Nothing more – nothing less.
Ashkenazi sexual sadist achieving climax by using a whip to rape a helpless human being to death.
Jewish Community Failure to Report is the Same as Enabling
Proof of this higher sense of morality is evident in the European Jewish's community's involvement in the genocide occurring in Darfur, Sudan. In the New Jersey Jewish News, in an article entitled "Not on my Watch, it states: "Proud of the fact that UJC MetroWest filled four buses with some 400 rally-goers, Max Kleinman, the federation’s executive vice president, said the coalition’s broad base "gives us the opportunity to strengthen our relationship with the African-American community." The article's title "Not on my Watch" makes it crystal clear -- that if one is watching an act of wrongdoing, one has the moral responsibility to report it.
Another example of the European Jewish community's will to report wrongdoing is its dogged desire to ensure that the world knows of the Jewish Holocaust where 6,000,000 Jews (actually there were 11,000,000 persons, but for reasons unknown the 5,000,000 non-Jews are very rarely included). There are specific days which commemorate the Jewish Holocaust. Grade schools, high school, colleges, even work sites have ceremonies to ensure that the public never forgets the lack of international involvement that led to the deaths of millions of innocent people.
Why is it then, that members of the Jewish community devote much less time to the Maafa, which lasted longer than the Holocaust of Germany and took more lives? Why is the Jewish doctrine of the curse of black skin — the diabolical teaching that led to the rationalization of the world's worst Holocaust trivialized, or at least not given the airtime that the Holocaust of Germany is given?
· "According to the Alliance for Authentic Judaism, Jews may not sue fellow Jews in Gentile courts, or even call the police on another Jews..."
· "No Jew or Jewess, wherever he may be, is allowed to go to a non-Jewish court, or to their offices or officers, without exception. If there should be any disagreement between Jews, they should turn to a Jewish Beis Din for their legal proceedings according to Jewish law…"
· "It is not permissible under any circumstances, to summon a fellow Jew to a non-Jewish court prior to summoning him to a Jewish Beis Din…"
· "No Jew, even if he is a rabbi or leader, is allowed to permit other Jews to go to non-Jewish court before summoning the other party to Beis Din…"
· "A Jewish man or woman who calls the police on the other, is included in the classification of moser…a moser is a Jew who brings the unlawful activities of another Jew to the attention of Gentile authorities. According to the Talmud, such "informers" can be thrown into a pit and not brought out, i.e., murdered.
· The Talmud also instructs its followers to lie to non-Jews if the need arises: "Where a suit arises between an Israelite and a heathen, if you can justify the former according to te laws of Israel, justify him and say: 'This is our law'; so also if you can justify him by the laws of the heathens justify him and say [to the other party:] 'This is your law'; but if this cannot be done, we use subterfuges to circumvent him. — Babylonian Talmud Tractate Baba Kamma 113a.
While the aforementioned statements do not specifically prevent Jews from publicly disclosing the slanderous doctrine of the curse of black skin, it should be clear to anyone that based on the above, not publicly disclosing the Jewish community's involvement in the promulgation of the myth of black inferiority is strongly implied. Proof of this implication is that fact that Africans were enslaved by both European Christians and European Jews. After the Emancipation Proclamation, neither European Christians nor European Jews made any attempt to pay out money to the individuals that they had enslaved. Both European Christian and European Jews capitalized financially by continuing to pay African workers far less than their white counterparts. As expressed by author Roberta Strauss Feuerlicht, Jewish individuals took advantage of the low social status of their reputation-less "schvartzes" by paying them next to nothing.
The European Jewish community has a moral responsibility once and for all to publicly admit that there are still individuals in this community that believe and promulgate the slanderous Jewish religiously-fomented doctrine of the curse of black skin. Its responsible rabbis must publicly admit that this doctrine is a lie that has no basis in the Torah. They must publicly admit that this doctrine was intended to dehumanize Africans so that rich members of both the European Christian and European Jewish communities could take advantage of Africans without a moral outcry from the white public. It must publicly condemn those members, like Dov Ber Schwartz and members of the Satmar community, who continue to teach this doctrine to their congregants. And it must allow Africans to have access to the names of those Jews who continue to disseminate this slanderous lie.
Unless it accedes to the above, the European Jewish community's failure to publicly report the slander of Africans by its members will be seen as an act of enabling and will be dealt with as such.
One cannot straddle the fence on this issue. Either one is a supporter of truth and justice, or one is a supporter of hatred, bigotry and slander.