|
|
THE
SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE WORSHIP OF MOLECH AND DSM V’s DIAGNOSIS OF SEXUAL
SADISM Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental Illnesses; Sexual Sadism Disorder Diagnostic
Criteria 302.84 (F65.52) Over
a period of at least 6 months, recurrent and intense sexual arousal from the
physical or psychological suffering of another person, as manifested by
fantasies, urges, or behaviors. The
individual has acted on these sexual urges with a nonconsenting person, or
the sexual urges or fantasies cause clinically significant distress or
impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning. Diagnostic Features The
diagnostic criteria for sexual sadism disorder are intended to apply both to
individuals who freely admit to having such paraphilic interests and to those
who deny any sexual interest in the physical or psychological suffering of
another individual despite substantial objective evidence to the contrary. ...Examples
of individuals who deny any interest in the physical or psychological
suffering of another individual include individuals known to have inflicted
pain or suffering on multiple victims on separate occasions but who deny any
urges or fantasies about such sexual behavior and who may further claim that
known episodes of sexual assault were either unintentional or nonsexual.
Others may admit past episodes of sexual behavior involving the infliction of
pain or suffering on a nonconsenting individual but do not report any
significant or sustained sexual interest in the physical or psychological
suffering of another individual. Since these individuals deny having urges or
fantasies involving sexual arousal to pain and suffering, it follows that
they would also deny feeling subjectively distressed or socially impaired by
such impulses. Such individuals may be diagnosed with sexual sadism disorder
despite their negative self-report. Their recurrent behavior constitutes
clinical support for the presence of the paraphilia of sexual sadism (by satisfying
Criterion A) and simultaneously demonstrates that their paraphilically
motivated behavior is causing clinically significant distress, harm, or risk
of harm to others (satisfying Criterion B). "Recurrent"
sexual sadism involving nonconsenting others (i.e., multiple victims, each on
a separate occasion) may, as general rule, be interpreted as three or more
victims on separate occasions. Fewer victims can be interpreted as satisfying
this criterion, if there are multiple instances of infliction of pain and
suffering to the same victim, or if there is corroborating evidence of a
strong or preferential interest in pain and suffering involving multiple
victims. Note that multiple victims, as suggested earlier, are a sufficient
but not a necessary condition for diagnosis, as the criteria may be met if
the individual acknowledges intense sadistic sexual interest.
N.Y. State Lawmaker Apologizes for Blackface Costume By
Sonia Kennebeck, CNN Tue
February 26, 2013 Story
Highlights ·
Brooklyn Democrat Dov
Hikind dressed in blackface for a Purim party. ·
He apologized to "anyone who was
offended" but added, "that was not the intention." ·
One of his Assembly colleagues calls
the apology "a beginning" but inadequate.
The
Ashkenazi Jewish Slave Trade was not primarily for cheap labor. The race of
the victims was used as an excuse to cover the real goal. The real reason for
Ashkenazi-influenced enslavement of Africans (and all other people since) is
demonic torture, sex, and murder. The Babylonian Talmud advocates what the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Illnesses, Volume 5 describes as
sexual sadism. Unless it is forcibly stopped, this group of people (including
non-Ashkenazi members who have aligned themselves with Molech-worshiping
members of the Ashkenazim) will not stop torturing, raping, and killing. Like
the demons who possess them, they are sex addicts. Without Jehovah-approved
force, they will not stop. They will continue to use politics, race, financial
issues, and other irrelevant issues in the same manner that all junkies use
excuses to hide their addiction. There are no political, religious, social,
or other irrelevant issues. They are snuff addicts. Unless they are stopped,
they will continue to try to satiate an insatiable appetite for torture,
deviant sex, and murder – a parasitic appetite that, if left unchecked, will
be the undoing of the entire human race. They are snuff addicts. Nothing more
– nothing less.
Ashkenazi sexual sadist achieving climax by
using a whip to rape a helpless human being to death.
|
African American History Month is Every Month!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Learn The "Ultimate
Weapon" -- Public Character Assassination
Abraham
H. Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League reportedly conducted a survey's
called the Index of Anti-Semitic Belief. According to this survey,
"one segment of American society, Jew-hatred is still strong among
African-Americans." Furthermore, it states that 34% of black Americans
fit into the ADL's category of most anti-Semitic" and that "34
percent of black Americans fit into the ADL's category of most anti-Semitic.
That is compared to only 9 percent of the general population." This
segment's desire to keep tabs on African Americans has translated itself into
spying, sometimes to the point of violating the law. Robert I. Friedman, a
writer with the Village Voice wrote an article regarding a man named Roy
Bullock. Roy Bullock was paid by the Anti-Defamation League to spy on various
organizations. Although some of these organization may have been anti-Semitic
in nature, not all of them were. Regarding the ADL's spying activities writer
Robert Friedman says: Over a 30-year period, he (ADL spy Roy Bullock)
compiled computer files for the ADL on 9876 individuals and more than 950
groups of all political stripes, including the NAACP, the Rainbow Coalition,
ACLU, the American Indian Movement, the Center for Investigative Reporting,
Pacifica, ACT UP, Palestinian and Arab groups, Sandinista solidarity groups,
Americans for Peace Now, and antiapartheid organizations. Bullock, who even
spied on the recently slain South African nationalist Chris Hani when he
visited the Bay Area in April 1991, sold many of his ADL files on
antiapartheid activists to South African intelligence. Meanwhile, between
1985 and 1993, the ADL paid him nearly $170,000, using a prominent Beverly
Hills attorney as a conduit in order to conceal its financial relationship
with Bullock."
The article goes on to say: "The ADL swung
sharply to the right during the Reagan administration, becoming a bastion of
neoconservatism. To Irwin Suall, a repentant
Trotskyite who heads the ADL's powerful Fact Finding Department, the real
danger to Jews is posed not by the right -- but by a coalition of leftists,
blacks, and Arabs, who in his view threaten the fabric of democracy in
America, as well as the state of Israel ... For years, journalists and
liberal members of the Jewish community knew the ADL spied on right-wing hate
groups. As long as the targets were anti-Semitic organizations like the
Liberty Lobby and Lyndon Larouche, no one seemed to
be particularly troubled. But the Bullock case reveals that the ADL also
spied on groups that have a nonviolent, and progressive orientation. This
apparent massive violation of civil liberties may end with the ADL's criminal
indictment in San Francisco, where the investigation began. The human rights
group faces possible criminal prosecution on as many as 48 felony counts,
including an indictment for gaining illegal access to police computers."1 According
to Mr. Friedman, the ADL also engaged in a smear campaign against respected
intellectuals and Middle East scholars who disagreed with its political views
by blacklisting them, thereby smearing their reputations. He states that many
believe that the ADL is increasingly in the defamation business. Some victims
of ADL's smear campaigns include Jesse Jackson, James Abourezk and the
leaders of the New Jewish Agenda. Another
Jewish organization that engaged in spying on African Americans is AIPAC, an
influential pro-Israel lobbying group. In an article written by Calev Ben-David of the Jerusalem Post it says: In 1988,
the investigative show 60 Minutes ran a critical piece on AIPAC using
information supplied by its former communications director (and ex-Jerusalem
Post reporter) Barbara Amouyal. Among the material
supplied by Amouyal was an internal memo suggesting
that the media be fed stories regarding Jesse Jackson's private life. Counterpunch,
another news organization reported on the spying activities of the
Anti-Defamation League. In the article entitled" Were the Spies
"Journalists? The ADL Snoops," dated January 23, 2002 it says:
"The organization's main 'fact-finder' was doubling as a spy for the
white South African government while his buddy, a San Francisco cop who had
tutored El Salvadoran death squads on the finer aspects of torture, was
providing its officials with personal information on the organization's
putative enemies when the story broke in San Francisco in December, 1992. The
organization was the Anti-Defamation League. The ADL claims to be the
nation's leading defender against prejudice and bigotry but in this instance
its targets were members of the African National Congress and its supporters,
and apparently everyone, Arab and non-Arab, who had the temerity to criticize
Israel. This included some who drove to Arab community events where the ADL's
'fact-finder,' Roy Bullock, and the cop, Tom Gerard, took turns writing down
their license plate numbers, which Gerard turned into addresses thanks to his
access to California motor vehicle records. Their spying efforts proved to be
part of a much larger intelligence gathering operation that targeted some
12,000 individuals and more than 600 left-of-center organizations in northern
California. After the first flurry of publicity, the ADL's spin doctors
successfully kept the story from receiving the national coverage that the
situation warranted. But the story hasn't gone away. Last November the
California Court of Appeals handed down a decision that paves the way for a
major test later this year of the ADL's penchant for spying on its enemies.
It was the most significant episode in a slow-moving class-action case filed
in 1993 by 19 pro-Palestinian and antiapartheid activists who claim to be
victims of the ADL's snooping operations. The plaintiffs say they were
illegally spied on by Bullock, then considered the ADL's top
"fact-finder" by his now deceased chief, Irwin Suall,
and that such spying constituted an invasion of privacy under the provisions
of the California Constitution."2 On
rare occasions, individuals who have been subjected to negative publicity by
the Anti-Defamation League have won court cases against the ADL for
defamation of character and invasion of privacy as a result of spying. In the
case of the Quigleys, a couple living in the suburb
of Evergreen, Colorado, the jurors in the case awarded them $10.5 million in
damages. The Quigleys had been called anti-Semites
by the ADL and subjected to spying by both their Jewish neighbors and the ADL
itself. The Institute for Historical Review, in its article entitled
"Anti-Defamation League Suffers Major Legal Defeat" it says: "At
a 1994 news conference, the ADL had accused the Quigleys,
a couple in the Denver suburb of Evergreen, of perpetrating the worst
anti-Semitic incident in the area in ten years. The ADL accused them of
launching a campaign against their Jewish neighbors, Mitchell and Candace
Aronson, to run them out of town and threatening to commit acts such as
painting over doors on their neighbors' home. Concluding a four-week trial,
the jury found that more than 40 statements by Saul F. Rosenthal, director of
the ADL's Mountain States chapter, were defamatory and "not
substantially true."3 Former
congressman, Pete McCloskey, was another victim of the ADL's spy/smear
campaign. In a case between Mr. McCloskey and the ADL, the jury decided that
the ADL had violated Mr. McCloskey's rights and awarded him $150,000.
According to an article written by Barbara Ferguson of the Arab News dated
April 25, 2002, it says: "The lawsuit came after raids were made by the
San Francisco Police Department and the FBI on offices of the ADL in both San
Francisco and Los Angeles, which found that the ADL was engaged in extensive
domestic spying operations on a vast number of individuals and institutions
around the country. During the course of the inquiry in San Francisco, the
SFPD and FBI determined the ADL had computerized files on nearly 10,000
people across the country, and that more than 75 percent of the information
had been illegally obtained from police, FBI files and state drivers’ license
data banks."4 Unlike
ethnic groups like the Satmar and Hasidic Jews who are not readily open to
outsiders, African Americans tend to be open to strangers. African diasporal
neighborhoods are filled with businesses from diverse ethnic backgrounds --
Italian, Dominican, Korean, Chinese, Greek, Middle Eastern and yes, Jewish.
Our openness places us in the position of being infiltrated by individuals
who do not have our best interest at heart. It
is unhealthy to have a relationship with any entity whose members
engage in activities that disparages one's existence or even violates one's
rights. Sadly, this is the relationship that Africans have with the European
Jewish community. There are many European Jews who share a love of justice
with Africans and want to see African people treated fairly. But when all is said
and done, those same Jews will maintain their silence about any violation of
an African's right if it means exposing the immoral or illegal actions of a
member of their own group. Africans
must realize that since there are very few Jewish organizations that have our
best interests at heart, Africans must exercise restraint regarding what
information we share with these organizations and caution with whom we choose
as friends. A
known situation were Jewish organizations like the Anti-Defamation League can
(and probably will) engage in spying against Africans is at protests and
rallies. Africans leave themselves open to be spied on by organizations bent
on portraying Africans as criminals. Sometimes it is better to engage in the
enforcement of our rights behind closed doors -- where it becomes more
feasible to identify those individuals who are legitimately associated with
the African struggle, and even more importantly, to perform necessary
background checks on these individuals to ensure that those involved in the
African struggle with us are not spies. This
is not intended to erode any attempts between the European Jewish and African
communities, but ask yourself: Why should I make the details of my
life known to them when they are not making the details of their lives known
to me? In
Matthew 10:16 Jesus left an important message that the African diasporal
community would do well to obey: "Look! I am sending you forth as sheep amidst
wolves; therefore, prove yourselves cautious as serpents and yet innocent as
doves."
Footnotes: 1. http://www.webshells.com/adlwatch/news22.htm 2. http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/spies.htm 3. http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n3p18_ADL.html 4. http://www.impactnet.org/html/adl_spying.html |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![Jew whipping slave[6]](chapter_10_the_ultimate_weapon_public_character_assassination_files/image014.png)
